<?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'?><?xml-stylesheet href="http://www.blogger.com/styles/atom.css" type="text/css"?><feed xmlns='http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom' xmlns:openSearch='http://a9.com/-/spec/opensearchrss/1.0/'><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1306058079346645855.post3818691981347187844..comments</id><updated>2010-07-29T08:59:47.385-07:00</updated><title type='text'>Comments on Warcraft Help Guide - Wow Guide - Wow Leveling Guide for All Classes: Tailoring Vs. Blacksmithing - Proc Vs On Demand AP...</title><link rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#feed' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.nomorenoob.com/feeds/3818691981347187844/comments/default'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1306058079346645855/3818691981347187844/comments/default'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://www.nomorenoob.com/2009/08/tailoring-vs-blacksmithing-proc-vs-on.html'/><author><name>Blackthought</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/15343198105693822738</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email></author><generator version='7.00' uri='http://www.blogger.com'>Blogger</generator><openSearch:totalResults>2</openSearch:totalResults><openSearch:startIndex>1</openSearch:startIndex><openSearch:itemsPerPage>25</openSearch:itemsPerPage><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1306058079346645855.post-6392524187095177563</id><published>2010-07-29T08:59:47.385-07:00</published><updated>2010-07-29T08:59:47.385-07:00</updated><title type='text'>Flaw 1&gt; It’s apparent you didn’t read the thread o...</title><content type='html'>Flaw 1&amp;gt; It’s apparent you didn’t read the thread or you wuld have seen the calculations on getting to 100, at the time this was written the PPM was being listed as 1ppm, not 2, believe it or not there’s these things called patches and sometimes they change things. But for the sake of accuracy I’ll thank you for updated the PPM. What I’ll do next is adjust the post.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Flaw 2&amp;gt; Agreed. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Flaw 3&amp;gt; Agreed again. The object of the post was to address the use of proc vs constant buffages. But yes, as STRENGTH will actually scale with many tree talents you definitely benefit more for each point in strength vs AP. 20% more strength in fury results in a 16ap increase (40 strength x 20% X 2 for ap conversion) in other words you could increase the amount by 16 ap, lending to the credence that blacksmithing is the way to go for a warrior. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Flaw 4&amp;gt; Again I agree. At the time this was written ArP was but a budding science, I honestly can’t even remember if the 100% cap was in effect at this time. I would hope that all warriors now know that gemming ArP &amp;gt; Strength if you’re able to get to 100% via trink procs (grim troll etc). ArP cap being 1232(if I’m not mistaken) which basically means you should get to where your rating is 1232 – (your trink proc) = WHAT YOUR ArP needs to be. &lt;br /&gt;Thanks for pointing some of the errors out. &lt;br /&gt;Also, &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Fuk you noob there’s a lot of info out there and updating it can be a bit taxing at time, but we’re starting to track this stuff a bit better and hopefully can get more of the “older” information updated:)(seriously though thanks for pointing it out.)</content><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1306058079346645855/3818691981347187844/comments/default/6392524187095177563'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1306058079346645855/3818691981347187844/comments/default/6392524187095177563'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://www.nomorenoob.com/2009/08/tailoring-vs-blacksmithing-proc-vs-on.html?showComment=1280419187385#c6392524187095177563' title=''/><author><name>Blackthought</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/15343198105693822738</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:extendedProperty xmlns:gd='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005' name='OpenSocialUserId' value='00332068925672804937'/></author><thr:in-reply-to xmlns:thr='http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0' href='http://www.nomorenoob.com/2009/08/tailoring-vs-blacksmithing-proc-vs-on.html' ref='tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1306058079346645855.post-3818691981347187844' source='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1306058079346645855/posts/default/3818691981347187844' type='text/html'/></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1306058079346645855.post-5403820148423772180</id><published>2010-07-28T14:41:44.218-07:00</published><updated>2010-07-28T14:41:44.218-07:00</updated><title type='text'>Flaw 1) Berserking is 400 AP, not 100 AP. Berserki...</title><content type='html'>Flaw 1) Berserking is 400 AP, not 100 AP. Berserking is a 2.0 PPM chance with no ICD, averaging it at 400x15x2/60 = 200 AP a minute. 200&amp;gt; 110.&lt;br /&gt;Flaw 2) When calculating the value of the Tailoring cloak enchant you forget to subtract the value of the previous cloak enchant, lowering it&amp;#39;s value.&lt;br /&gt;Flaw 3)Not factoring in 20% more strength for a fury warrior or 4% for Arms further increasing the value of Blacksmithing when using strength gems.&lt;br /&gt;Flaw 4)Assuming ArP is crap; when you are able to get to 100% ArP through gear/gemming, ArP is worth more than strength (and AP).&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;So my take on it is you&amp;#39;re still a noob.</content><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1306058079346645855/3818691981347187844/comments/default/5403820148423772180'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1306058079346645855/3818691981347187844/comments/default/5403820148423772180'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://www.nomorenoob.com/2009/08/tailoring-vs-blacksmithing-proc-vs-on.html?showComment=1280353304218#c5403820148423772180' title=''/><author><name>Anonymous</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email></author><thr:in-reply-to xmlns:thr='http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0' href='http://www.nomorenoob.com/2009/08/tailoring-vs-blacksmithing-proc-vs-on.html' ref='tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1306058079346645855.post-3818691981347187844' source='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1306058079346645855/posts/default/3818691981347187844' type='text/html'/></entry></feed>